With an average of roughly 13 games per day during the regular season, betting on the MLB can be an overwhelming experience, especially if you’re new to sports betting. The more information you have, the better. One valuable piece of info is the MLB public betting splits, i.e. how much money bettors have wagered on each side of the day’s MLB moneylines, runlines, and totals.
|spread||$$||Money %||Bet %||spread||Money %||Bet %||moneyline||Money %||Bet %||total||Money %||Bet %|
This page tracks the MLB public betting splits for each day of the 2022 Major League Baseball season. The table below today’s MLB betting splits shows the public’s cumulative record for the season.
Betting splits from DraftKings Sportsbook on November 5. Claim a DraftKings Sportsbook promo code to wager on the MLB playoffs.
The MLB betting splits for Game 6 of the World Series show the following trends:
What Are MLB Public Betting Splits?
MLB public betting splits show how much money has been wagered on each side of the moneyline, runline, and run total in any given MLB game. The splits are expressed as a percentage. The splits also show how many total wagers (again, as a percentage) have been put on either side of the moneyline, runline, and total.
It’s easiest to understand MLB public betting splits through examples. Assume the Chicago Cubs and St Louis Cardinals are playing at Wrigley and the Cubs are a -120 home favorite with the Cardinal a +100 road underdog. If the public has wagered $600 on the Cubs moneyline and only $400 on the Cardinals moneyline, the moneyline betting splits for that game will be 60% for the Cubs and 40% for the Cardinals.
Let’s assume the runline for that game is Cubs -1.5 (+150) / Cardinals +1.5 (-175). Unlike the moneyline, $350 has been wagered on St Louis to cover, and only $150 has been wagered on Chicago to win by multiple runs. In this case, the runline betting splits would be 30% for the Cubs and 70% for the Cardinals (because 70% of all the money bet on the runline has been wagered on STL).
In this theoretical example, the total has been set at a low 7.5 on a windy day in Chicago. Only $50 has been wagered on over 7.5 runs while $450 has been bet on the under. The run total splits in this case would be 10% for the over and 90% for the under.
The MLB betting splits table at the top of this page displays both “% Handle” and “% Bets”. The examples illustrated above all reflect the handle percentage. (“Handle” meaning the total amount of money wagered on a betting market.) But sportsbooks also track the percentage of bets wagered on those same markets.
Going back to the examples above, assume the $600 that has been wagered on the Cubs moneyline came from six wagers of $100 each. The $400 bet on the Cardinals moneyline came from just two wagers of $200. That means six out of eight total bets on this market were on the Cubs, while just two out of eight were on St Louis. The “% Bets” in this case will be 75% for Chicago and 25% for St Louis.
Why is this valuable information? Some people will infer that sharps are backing the Cardinals and novice bettors are betting on the Cubs – because sharps tend to wager more. However, that isn’t necessarily true, so use that approach with caution. The raw numbers don’t indicate who made the wagers and there are plenty of novice bettors with money to burn.
“Fading the public” means taking the opposite side as the majority of the public. In the Cubs/Cardinals example we’ve been using, the public was backing the Cubs moneyline at a 60/40% split, the Cardinals runline at 70/30% split, and the under at a 90/10% split.
If you faded the public on those markets, you would be taking the Cardinals moneyline, Cubs runline, and the over.
In reality, “fading the public” is usually used as a betting approach when the public betting action has changed the odds.
If enough money is wagered on one side of a betting market, sportsbooks will usually shift the odds to encourage wagers on the opposite side (thus reducing their risk exposure). The run total splits in our Cubs/Cardinals example (90/10% in favor of the under) might encourage oddsmakers to drop the total to 7.0 or even 6.5.
Some bettors will take that opportunity to bet on the over. The basic theory here is that oddsmakers are good at their job and likely set the odds appropriately at the outset. They changed the odds to ensure the sportsbook is not exposed to too much risk, but this odds shift is often just a shrewd business practice, not a reflection of the oddsmakers’ opinion changing.
Of course, like all betting strategies, “fading the public” must be used with caution. Oddsmakers do not always post statistically appropriate lines, and conditions can change after odds have been released. Landslide public betting splits are often the result of significant injuries or changes in weather. Make sure you do your own research before wagering your money.